| Volume 1/Issue No. 3 | A monthly newsletter | September 1995 |
What "sacred principle" was Mr. Bush referring to? One section of the U.N. World Constitution states: "The age of nations must end...the governments of the nations have decided to order their separate sovereignties into one government to which they surrender their arms."
The "Doctor of Democracy" is right in one respect. There is no conspiracy. It is a matter of public record. The problem is that so few Americans have ever taken the time or trouble to learn what our paragons of wisdom are up to in Washington, it just sounds like a conspiracy, even to Mr. Limbaugh.
The New World Order (NWO) is simply this: all nations that have nuclear weapons will turn them over to U.N. control, thus making the U.N. the supreme military power on earth; and no nation, including the U.S., would have the military might to wage war. United States sovereignty, along with the sovereignty of other nations, will come to an end.
This plan is described in U.S.C Title 22 Sec. 2551 through 2571. It's referred to as the "Arms Control and Disarmament Act." It is also found in Freedom From War, Department of State Publication No. 7277, signed by President Kennedy in 1961.
Kennedy may have had second thoughts after signing 7277. In a speech at Columbia University, he said, "The high office of the President has been used to foment a plot to destroy America's freedoms and before I leave office, I must inform the citizens of their plight." Exactly what Kennedy was referring to will never be known; he was assassinated ten days later.Before Limbaugh can deny that there is such thing as a NWO, he must first prove USC Title 22 and State Department Publication 7277 do not exist. No easy task.
The disarmament process will, according to 7277, take place in three stages. The third and final stage states:
"In stage III, progressive controlled disarmament and continuously developing principles and procedures of international law would proceed to a point where no state, (i.e. nation) would have the military power to challenge the progressively strengthened U.N. Peace Force and all international disputes would be settled according to the agreed principles of international conduct." -- Page 18-19Not only would this suspend the sovereignty of the United States, but our Constitution and Bill of Rights as well.
This type of "World Unity" was once tried in ancient Babylon under the leadership of Nimrod. It didn't work then; it won't work now. During Nimrod's reign the nations of the world were united by a common language.
Today, our sagacious world leaders will try it again through "agreed principles of international conduct."
Someone once said (and it wasn't Limbaugh): "There is nothing more fearful than ignorance in action"; and this is a perfect example!QUESTION AUTHORITY
When was the last time you, as an American, questioned government's authority? Did you ever deem it necessary to question the expanding role of government into your personal life? Perhaps you are under the impression that all is well and, therefore, you never thought of questioning the government and its activities. But all cannot be well if one doesn't question authority. If authority isn't questioned, then it would be safe to assume that vigilance is absent. With the absence of vigilance your freedoms become fewer and fewer, thereby creating a natural flow of power from you, the people, to the government. What are the end results of a government which expands beyond its proper function? Simply, you, the people, are ruled. Therefore, it would be prudent for each one of us to question every piece of legislation from zoning to forfeitures, to foreign entanglements and everything in between, and determine whether or not it was approved with your consent and it violates your God given inalienable rights to life, liberty and property. And if it does, you, being an American, should stand tall and repudiate every law and law maker, for both are repugnant to freedom!
If liberty is to shine once again, it is in our best interest to QUESTION AUTHORITY!
I am a 54 year old computer consultant. Although my weapon of choice is a word processor, I am being prosecuted and persecuted for bearing a Browning 9mm in the exercise of my God given and constitutionally secured rights.
The state penalty for this first "offense" is probation; a second "offense" is six months incarceration. I have been jailed for almost eight months because I will not plead guilty. My bail was set at $50,000 cash. I am at Camden County Correctional Facility, 330 Federal Street, Camden, N.J. My next court date is September 18, 1995 in front of Judge Eynon at the HALL OF JUSTICE, 5th and Mickle Streets, Camden, NJ 08103. The Assignment Judge is Rosselli. Any show of support (telephone calls, letter to the Judge or appearance at court date) would be greatly appreciated. Any coordination may be accomplished through my son, Jeffrey Jacoby, Sui juris, at (609) 482-9695, evenings are best times. Jeffrey is a supporter of NJM. I will join and support NJM as soon as possible.
For you information I have enclosed a copy of Congressional Findings and Declaration pertaining to firearms.
Also, a Supreme Court case, Presser v. Illinois - 116 U.S. 252 states: "the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."
Please help me to secure our rights. Sincerely, Robert JacobyP.S. The newsletter is great! Keep up the good work. Is there a South Jersey branch of NJM?
There are rumors to that effect.-- Ed. * A mixed war is one which is made on one side by public authority, and on the other by mere private persons.-- Black's Law DictionaryI know it will come as a shock to many of you to discover that you have a mental illness -- and a new one at that -- but take heart, many before you have suffered with this disorder, and have gone on to lead productive lives.
First, let us analyze the symptoms:
1. Do you feel that the federal government is getting too big, too intrusive?
2. Have you ever expressed dismay at the 4 1/2 trillion dollar national debt?
3. Do you ever find yourself listening to a patriot radio show on shortwave?
4. Do you enjoy being in the company of other people who share your views about our government?
5. Do you own a firearm and have considered burying it?
6. When you see Rep. Charles Schumer on TV, have you ever muttered expletives?
The list goes on and on, but you get the idea. But take heart, brave patriots. Many of the Founding Fathers of our nation suffered from Government Phobia. So much so that they expressed fear of the federal government before there was a federal government.
Psychiatrists would call this Pre-Government Phobia today, but it was called anti-federalism 200 years ago.
Many of our Founding Fathers suffered from Government Phobia to such an extreme that they included the Second Amendment in our Bill of Rights so that we would have arms with which to protect ourselves, as a last resort, against the newly formed government. Now that's phobic!
Our Bill of Rights, which is basically a pro-people, anti-government document, came into existence through the efforts of pre-government phobics; Patrick Henry being the most noted member of that group.
Could there be a connection between Government Phobia and another disease that has infected the body politic for the last sixty years? Yes, we are speaking of another mental disorder -- the feared, the dreaded, "Potomac Fever."
Unlike Government Phobia, Potomac Fever strikes very few Americans, and in many aspects, is like AIDS: it is acquired. First, you get elected to a Federal office, then, after living in Washington D.C. for a period of time, strange behavioral patterns begin to manifest themselves. Symptoms include a desire to be reelected. Tom Foley suffered from this symptom to such an extent that when constituents in his home state voted for term limitations, Foley sued them in court.The effects accompanying Potomac Fever are so numerous it has given birth to a new growth industry, i.e. talk radio. Talk radio hosts will sit behind a microphone for hours every day and converse with their listeners about the symptoms and adverse effects Potomac Fever is having upon the country.
Potomac Fever and Government Phobia go hand in hand. You see, without Potomac Fever, there would be no Government Phobia.
If mental health officials want to recognize Government Phobia as a bonafide mental disorder, take advantage of it. Go to a psychiatrist, tell him what you think of the federal government and get yourself certified as having Government Phobia. Then at a future date, should you ever find yourself in court fighting big government, don't bring a lawyer, bring your doctor. He'll explain to the judge that you're not guilty because of your "condition."
There you have it. According to Mr. Dees militias are terrorist, right-wing, extremist hate groups with ties to neo-Nazi and racist elements.
Mr. Dees identifies himself as the Chief Trial Counsel of the SPLC. "Poverty law" has evidently worked well for him; he reports that SPLC is a little over half way to its goal of a $100 million endowment. But that begs the question: where did he get the first $50 million? NJM researchers believe that its source could be Executive Order 12333, United States Intelligence Activities, signed by President Ronald Reagan on Dec. 4, 1981, in response to the "war on drugs". Paragraph 2.7 states: "Agencies within the Intelligence Community are authorized to enter into contracts or arrangements for the provision of goods or services with private companies or institutions in the United States and need not reveal the sponsorship of such contracts or arrangements for authorized intelligence purposes." Could it be that Mr. Dees is a contract agent of the Attorney General, BATF and FBI who slants his intelligence reports to suit his Federal paymasters? Without Federal funding how else could he afford to put out a bi-monthly report to 6,000 law enforcement agencies and still have $50 million in the bank?
But even if the SPLC is using donations to slander the militia and undermine the Constitution, grave questions still remain about the quality of the intelligence Mr. Dees is providing to law enforcement. If the police actually believe his untrue and hateful allegations, the result could be tragic. For instance, did Sgt. Matt May of the Frazeyburg, Ohio, police department read Mr. Dees' inflammatory and unfounded reports and therefore feel justified in killing militia chaplain Mike Hill? Was the Randy Weaver family of Ruby Ridge, Idaho, stigmatized as belonging to a "hate group" that by inference was worthy of death? Based on Mr. Dees' bi-monthly reports did the sheriff of Boundary County, Idaho, step aside and leave the fate of the Weavers to the U.S Marshal Service and FBI? And what about the Branch Davidians of Waco, Texas? How many of their photographs are in Mr. Dees' files? And who is Mr. Dees anyway to be keeping files on private citizens?
To prevent Ruby Ridge, Waco and Mike Hill-like incidents from occurring here we have asked all twenty-one sheriffs to keep in touch with the New Jersey Militia, particularly before acting on, or permitting Federal police to act on, any intelligence whatsoever provided by Mr. Morris Dees or his colleagues at the Southern Poverty Law Center.
But just who are the "poverty" folks toiling in the vineyards of the SPLC? According to the July 10 Birmingham News the top officials are Eddie Ashworth, executive director (salary $144,704 plus benefits plan contributions of $8,439); Morris Dees, lead attorney (salary $144,403 plus benefits contribution of $11,008): Richard Cohen, legal director (salary $145,741 plus benefits plan contributions of $7,318); JoAnn Chancellor, administrator (salary $83,003); and Joseph Levin, chairman of the board (fees $77,373). The information was gleaned from reports filed by the non-profit organization with the IRS for the fiscal year 1993-94. Thus it appears that poverty is truly where is money is.
The reaction to the formation of the New Jersey Militia has been overwhelmingly favorable, despite the brickbats tossed our way by the media and some who actually believe what they have to say. Three of our most courageous members met with the Trenton Times and the resulting article (July 16) included the usual slanders. The State Police spokesman, for instance, who knows absolutely nothing about us, reportedly mentioned us and skinheads in the same breath. The counsel to the Mercer County Human Rights Commission opined that it is a "little scary" that we agree with Chief Justice Marshall's decision in Marbury vs. Madison that any law, including gun control law, that is repugnant to the Constitution is null and void. (What is truly scary is a "Human Rights Commission" that denies the most fundamental of human rights, the right to armed self-defense against predators both criminal and despotic.) A spokesman for Klanwatch, an arm of the Southern Poverty Law Center, which the Times helpfully identified as a group that "keeps tabs on radical right and racist groups", smeared militias as "the people that blew up the federal building." [Ed.: see the article on the SPLC above.] And Richard Miller, the chairman of the Coalition of New Jersey Sportsmen reportedly said that he has "no use for these people [militiamen] and would not get involved with them purely for appearances."
"The devices of power and its minions are the same in all countries and in all ages. It marks its victim; denounces it; and excites the public hatred, to conceal its own abuses and encroachments." (Sen. Henry Clay, March 14, 1834) Thus the government and the media, using the age-old formula, attempts to "excite the public hatred" against the militia, just as it did against the Branch Davidians at Waco. The government and its media lackeys denounced the Davidians as cultists; what respectable person would defend a cultist? Likewise the media has denounced the militiaman as racist and right-wing, which must be true (they say it's so); how could respectable people like Mr. Miller defend a right wing racist?
The smear of the militiaman reminds one of the smear of the Jew in Nazi Germany, and of the famous admission of moral cowardice: they came for the Jews and I did not help because I was not a Jew; they came for the Communists and I did not help because I was not a Communist; they came for the trade unionists and I did not help because I was not a trade unionist; and when they came for me there was no one left to help me.
In a sense the militiaman has taken the place of the Jew as an object of the hatred of the Establishment fascists of our day. (Yes, they are the ideological heirs of Hitler, right down to their enactment of the Gun Control Act of 1968, taken straight from the Nazi weapons law of 1938, at the very hour our brave soldiers were dying in Vietnam supposedly to stop the advance of tyranny.) But a funny thing happened. Despite the media's best efforts most Americans have seen through their prevarication about what happened at Waco. And judging by the favorable reaction to the formation of the New Jersey Militia many are seeing through the lies being told about us as well.
For the general public, one greatly beneficial though unrecognized by-product of the militia movement has been the forcing of mainstream media to cover events it previously did everything to suppress.
While militia groups for years cited Ruby Ridge as a prime example of out-of-control federal power, media outlets found no problem with an FBI sniper shooting dead an unarmed woman through the window of her home as she nursed an infant in her arms. The fact that ATF and FBI killed or wounded an entire innocent family over what was eventually proven in court to be an illegal entrapment scheme was, according to our self-described "free press", better kept hidden from public view.
After the Oklahoma bombing the media again parroted the official government line.
Of the 186 victims of the Oklahoma bombing it is a fact that none were ATF agents - the alleged targets of the attack. While most of their offices on the 9th floor were decimated, no ATF agent was killed because they were absent from the building that day. An initial explanation was that they called in sick, another is that they just happened to be late for work that morning. ATF now officially claims that all agents were out on assignments, though at least one inside source has come forward to say ATF personnel were given the option to take that day off.
In a live CNN television interview broadcast on May 23 Edye Smith, mother of two young children killed in the explosion, made the statement:"There are a lot of questions that have been left unanswered, a lot of questions we don't have answers for; we're being told to keep our mouths shut, not talk about it, don't ask those questions, and I think things are going to get a lot busier.
"Well, we've - just from the beginning, we, along with hundreds and thousands of other people, want to know just - and we just innocently ask questions, you know - where was ATF? All 15 or 17 of their employees survived, and they live - they're on the ninth floor. Where were they?"Did they have a warning sign? I mean, did they think it might be a bad day to go in the office? They had an option to not go to work that day, and my kids didn't get that option, nobody else in that building got that option. And we're just asking questions, we're not making accusations. We just want to know, and they're telling us 'Keep you mouth shut, don't talk about it.'"
CNN, true to its censorship role, abruptly terminated the interview and cut to a different story saying: "Well Edye Smith...thanks for joining us. Obviously there are a lot of questions that have to be answered about this investigation." And so the questions still remain: Why did ATF agents stay out of the building the day of the bombing? Who is threatening Edye Smith to keep quiet? Only half of the children enrolled in the day care center showed up for school that day - were they the children of ATF agents? Why is Congress refusing to investigate these and other even more explosive questions relating to the most devastating terrorist attack on U.S. soil? For Americans, such questions will likely never be answered through existing media - which have seized the Oklahoma bombing as their basis to vilify the militia movement and promote even greater government power and control.Instead, it is likely through their own complex network of fax systems, Internet communication, newsletters, computer networks and short-wave radio that militia and patriot groups will again circumvent the hopelessly corrupt and controlled media to provide the American public with the truth about this most devastating and disgraceful act.
Only then should the American public expect the "free press" to take notice and perhaps turn to reporting the truth. -- Contributed by The New Jersey Freedoms Network
"In the beginning of change, the patriot is a scarce man; brave, hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, however, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot."
-- Mark TwainNew Jersey Militia
P.O. Box 10176
Trenton, NJ 08650
Newsletter subscription - Donation $10.00 -- Cash or blank money order
Name___________________________________________
Address________________________________________
City____________________________________________
Phone(______)___________________________________
Back to Home Page